Executive Synopsis

Overview of the commercial dispute weaponized into a criminal complaint against Trading Shastra Academy (TSA). The objective is to demonstrate the malafide nature of the proceedings and the illegal freezing of accounts.

Current Status

FROZEN

10-12 Bank Accounts (Family & Employees)

Action Required: Sec 457 CrPC

Financial Dispute Context

Total Course Fee: ₹3,30,000

The Accusation vs. Reality

Claim: "Investment Fraud / Scheme"

Reality: Fee Refund Dispute (Civil)

Evidence: Student Agreement & Invoice

Evidence Locker

Direct comparisons between the Complainant's allegations and the documented reality.

Exhibit A: Admission of Incompetence

Sir isme change kaise kru? (How do I change this?)

Support: Ruko (Wait)

Relevance: Proves the student was actively learning and struggling with tools, contradicting the claim of a "passive investment scheme".

Exhibit B: The Refund Offer

Nov 29, 2025

You will get the refund in the first week of January. We need a month for accounting.

Student: Okay.

Malice Indicator: Student agreed to wait until January, then immediately filed a police complaint to extort money faster.

Legal Strategy Map

The counter-offensive plan to unfreeze accounts and hold the complainant accountable.

Defense: The "Quashing" Route

1. Writ Petition / Sec 482 CrPC

Move High Court to quash FIR on grounds that a civil dispute (refund) is dressed as criminal fraud.

2. The "Indian Oil" Precedent

Indian Oil Corp v. NEPC India Ltd.: Supreme Court ruled against using police machinery to settle civil scores.

3. Section 457 CrPC

Immediate application to Magistrate for release of frozen accounts (defreezing) citing business paralysis.

Offense: Damages & Counter-Claims

1. Malicious Prosecution

File suit for damages. The "Women's Cell" was used purely to bypass commercial court procedures and inflict trauma.

2. Defamation (Sec 500 IPC)

Claim damages for tarnishing 12 years of goodwill by labeling a legitimate educator as a "Fraud".

3. Extortion (Sec 383 IPC)

Freezing family accounts to force an immediate payout (bypassing the agreed Jan date) amounts to extortion.

Lawyer Acquisition Kit

Targeted resources to find the Right lawyer for this specific crisis in Delhi NCR.

1. The Ideal Candidate Profile

Constitutional/Rights Focus: Someone who hates Police Overreach (Freezing accounts without notice).
"White Collar" Defense: Experienced in Section 482 CrPC Quashing & PMLA.
Aggressive Proceduralist: Knows how to embarrass the IO (Investigating Officer) for skipping BNSS procedures.
Avoid: Generic "Dalal" district lawyers or overly soft Corporate Firms.

2. LinkedIn Search Keywords

"482 CrPC" AND "Quashing" AND "Delhi High Court"

"PMLA" AND "Bank Freeze" AND "Criminal Defense"

"White Collar Crime" AND "Litigation" AND "Delhi"

"Cyber Crime" AND "Debit Freeze"

Use these combinations in the LinkedIn search bar. Look for posts complaining about "Police Excesses".

3. The Approach Script (WhatsApp/LinkedIn)

Hi [Name], I am Himanshu from Trading Shastra Academy. We are facing an illegal bank freeze on 10+ accounts due to a disgruntled student weaponizing a 'Women's Cell' complaint to settle a fee refund dispute. It is a classic civil dispute converted into criminal harassment. I have a full dossier proving malafide intent. Looking for a counsel who stands against police overreach to handle the representation/quashing. Are you open for a brief consultation?

4. The "Litmus Test" Questions

Q1: Jurisdiction?

"The complaint is in Women's Cell but it's a commercial dispute. How do we bypass counseling?"

Good Answer: Writ Petition / Sec 482.

Q2: Damages?

"Can we claim damages for business loss due to the illegal freeze?"

Good Answer: Yes, Malicious Prosecution suit later.

Q3: Budget (15k)?

"My budget is tight. Can we start with just Drafting/Representation?"

Good Answer: Will draft strong representation to DCP/Bank for that fee.